(L/R) US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, arrive at a Department of Justice office in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2026. Members of Congress will be allowed to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files on Department of Justice computers starting on February 9. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, arrive at a Department of Justice office in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2026. Members of Congress will be allowed to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files on Department of Justice computers starting on February 9. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, arrive at a Department of Justice office in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2026. Members of Congress will be allowed to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files on Department of Justice computers starting on February 9. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, arrive at a Department of Justice office in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2026. Members of Congress will be allowed to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files on Department of Justice computers starting on February 9. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, go through security as they arrive at a Department of Justice office in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2026. Members of Congress will be allowed to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files on Department of Justice computers starting on February 9. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)

Phyllis Jones (L), attorney for Meta, arrives to the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Los Angeles, on February 9, 2026. Arguments are set to begin Monday in a landmark US trial that could establish a legal precedent on whether social media companies deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children. The case in Los Angeles Superior Court is being seen as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States. (Photo by Frederic J. Brown / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) Parents from the United Kingdom Mariano Janin, and George Nicolaou hold photos of their children outside the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Los Angeles, on February 9, 2026. Arguments are set to begin Monday in a landmark US trial that could establish a legal precedent on whether social media companies deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children. The case in Los Angeles Superior Court is being seen as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States. (Photo by Frederic J. Brown / AFP via Getty Images)

(L/R) Parents from the United Kingdom Mariano Janin, Ellen Roome, and George Nicolaou hold photos of their children outside the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Los Angeles, on February 9, 2026. Arguments are set to begin Monday in a landmark US trial that could establish a legal precedent on whether social media companies deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children. The case in Los Angeles Superior Court is being seen as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States. (Photo by Frederic J. Brown / AFP via Getty Images)